Our Practice Areas

3m Earplugs Lawsuit Attorneys

3m Earplugs Lawsuit Update

Service Members With Hearing Loss or Tinnitus Could Be Eligible For Compensation

The 3M Combat Arms Earplugs (CAEv2) issued to military personnel between 2003 and 2015 may have caused thousands of service members to suffer hearing damage. Due to poor design, the earplugs did not provide an adequate seal to protect the ear canal. 3M failed to disclose the problem despite internal tests showing the product was defective.

Defective 3M Combat Arms Earplugs

Service members frequently experience high noise levels in training and on the battlefield. It’s not surprising that the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs reports over 1.3 million military veterans currently receive disability compensation for hearing loss and approximately 2.3 million receive compensation for tinnitus. Military members are subject to a significant amount of noise that exceeds safe decibel levels. However, military personnel have little option but to remain in noisy environments to complete specific tasks and missions. Effective hearing protection devices are crucial in the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss.

3M claimed their Dual-Ended Combat Arms Earplugs could offer military personnel hearing protection that didn’t interfere with communication and coordination between troops. One end of the earplug would mitigate all noise, while the other would allow soldiers to hear crucial commands. However, the earplugs failed to selectively block noise, leaving service members vulnerable in extremely loud environments. As a result, service members did not receive the promised benefits, and now many are suffering from it.

3M neglected to inform the U.S. government that the 3M Combat Arms Earplugs were faulty, even though they were aware of the issue. As a result, the defect may have caused military personnel partial or complete hearing loss. Therefore, our law firm believes 3M should be held accountable and compensate veterans and service members suffering from hearing issues and tinnitus after using 3M’s defective earplugs.

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs sued the 3M Company because it believed 3M was at fault for supplying unsafe earplugs for service members in the military. 3M’s executives decided to lie about the product they were offering to our troops so they could land a multi-million-dollar deal with the U.S. Government. Now, thousands of lives have been affected by their negligence.

After this lawsuit, many active duty service members and veterans filed defective product claims against 3M. As a result, these cases have been given multidistrict litigation (MDL) status in the Northern District of Florida.

3M Earplug Lawsuit Latest Updates  

The recent large amounts awarded to plaintiffs in 3M earplug lawsuits mark three consecutive verdicts that were more than $50 million. Other bellwether trials are still ongoing.

March 25, 2022: Luke Vilsmeyer, an army veteran who claimed 3M’s Combat Arms Earplugs Version 2 caused him to have hearing loss and tinnitus, was awarded $50 million by a federal jury in Pensacola, Florida. This verdict is the second-largest award related to earplugs produced by 3M.

Vilsmeyer served in the Army from 1999 to 2020, as a howitzer gunner and a Green Beret. He used 3M’s Combat Arms Earplugs Version 2 from 2006 to 2017.

Additionally, a Tallahassee jury has recently awarded $8 million in compensatory damages to Steven Wilkerson. Wilkerson used 3M earplugs during training and combat while serving in the US Army National Guard and subsequently developed tinnitus and hearing loss.

There have been ten bellwether trials. Juries awarded nine out of the 13 plaintiffs damages, while the remaining four have lost at trial. Plaintiffs have won a total of $160 million. These results are very encouraging for plaintiffs. 

January 27, 2022: A federal jury in Pensacola, Florida, awarded $110 million to army veterans Ronald Sloan and William Wayman, who claimed 3M’s Combat Arms earplugs Version 2 caused them to have tinnitus and hearing loss. This verdict is the largest award so far in a 3M earplugs case

Both Sloan and Wayman were awarded $15 million in compensatory damages and $40 million in punitive damages. Each won more than the previously largest verdict of $22.5 million.

December 21, 2021: The 9th bellwether trial in the 3M earplug lawsuit concluded with a defense verdict last week. The jury determined that Carlos Montero did not prove that 3M’s earplugs were to blame for his hearing loss and gave a verdict in favor of the defense.

This victory for 3M in the earplugs lawsuits is only a week after 3Ms most significant loss, with a $22.5 million verdict awarded in the Finley trial.

December 10, 2021: Plaintiff Theodore Finley received a $22.5 million verdict in Florida. The jury awarded Finley $7.5 million in compensatory damages and $15 million in punitive damages.  

Finley was on active duty in the U.S. Army from 2006 to 2014 and used 3M earplugs while exposed to noise from mortars, machine guns, RPGs, mechanized vehicles, and aircraft. He was seeking damages for hearing loss and tinnitus caused by combat earplugs sold by 3M. This latest verdict surpasses seven previous rulings, including a $13 million verdict awarded by jurors to a U.S. Army sergeant last month.

The punitive damages resulted from the jury’s conclusion that 3M committed fraud “beyond a reasonable doubt.” This ruling is an exceptionally high threshold for plaintiffs to reach and demonstrates how outraged the jury was by 3M’s actions.   

November 2021: A jury awards plaintiff Camarillorazo $816,395 in compensatory damages and $12.245 million in punitive damages for a total award of over $13 million. The largest 3M earplug lawsuit verdict at the time.

However, another case involving the plaintiff Palanki ended with a defense verdict in favor of 3M.

Plaintiffs have now won six out of nine 3M earplug lawsuits. In the six victories for plaintiffs, the average award from the jury is over $5 million.

For another case, the jury found in favor of the 3M. The plaintiff, Michelle Blum, could not prove 3M was liable for hearing damage she suffered while wearing 3M’s earplugs in the Army.

The ruling in favor of the defense in the Blum case was not surprising. Defense counsel selected Blum’s case as a bellwether trial because she had a weak case with questions about whether she had hearing issues. The plaintiff’s lawyers attempted to exit the case three months before the trial. Blum’s attorneys knew her case would be difficult to win.

October 2021: The 8th Circuit denied 3M’s request to keep all earplug lawsuits in federal court. 3M tried to claim that because they designed the CAEv2 earplugs for military purposes, federal courts had exclusive jurisdiction over all earplug lawsuits.

The court stated that 3M did not offer enough evidence to show that it was “acting under” a federal agency regarding the earplug’s warning and instructions. Employees who got earplugs in the commercial market may continue to pursue their claims in state court, according to the verdict. However, the court found that lawsuits filed by defense contractors should proceed in federal court.

June 2021: A Florida jury awarded $1.7 million to Lloyd Baker; however, they found Baker 38 percent at fault. So the actual award was $1.1 million. The 3M earplug case verdict is a big win for plaintiffs seeking compensation in these lawsuits. The odds have shifted in favor of victims seeking 3M hearing damage compensation. The result informs 3M that these hearing loss cases are important and that an average settlement of $10,000 will not be enough to settle them.

June 2021: The second 3M earplug trial was a tinnitus case that ended with a win for the defense, 3M.

April 2021: Three plaintiffs in 3M cases were awarded $7.1 million by a federal jury in Florida. The jury awarded $2.1 million in punitive damages for each victim. This verdict shows the jury was angry at 3M’s conduct and should impact the settlement amounts in the 3M earplug lawsuit. After a five-week trial, we hope this verdict will have a game-changing effect on the individual settlement compensation payouts in these hearing loss claims.

July 2018: 3M agreed to pay the Department of Justice $9.1 million to settle claims that the company sold defective earplugs to the U.S. military. That settlement stemmed from two former 3M employees filing a whistleblower lawsuit.

What Should I Do If I Think I Have a 3M Earplug Case?

If you or a loved one has permanent hearing damage after using Dual-Ended Combat Arms Earplugs made by 3M during military service, contact the experienced product liability lawyers at Richard Schwartz & Associates, P.A Injury Lawyers to learn more about possible earplug litigation claims. 

You might be entitled to monetary compensation for your hearing injuries.
Why Hire Us?
Why Hire Us?
Common Questions
Get Started
Call (601) 988-8888 or fill out the form below to get started with a free consultation with a member of our team.

"It really only took one call! They followed up with me and called me to answer any questions I had. Nobody was rude or impatient! And when I still had further questions they transferred me to Richard Schwartz himself to answer any questions! Highly recommend this attorney!"

5  |  Jason Bordelon
Read Our Testimonials

Practice Areas

Why Hire Us?
Why Hire Us?
One Call, That’s All.
Get Started!
(601) 988-8888
162 East Amite St
Jackson, MS 39201
Map & Directions
193 S Commerce St #101
Tupelo, MS 38804
Map & Directions
201 Hardy St
Hattiesburg, MS 39401
Map & Directions
1702 MS-39 N, Suite 6
Meridian, MS 39301
Map & Directions
1835 HWY 45 North, Suite 105
Columbus, MS 39705
Map & Directions
Greenville, MS
By Appointment Only
Greenwood, MS
By Appointment Only
By submitting your request via our online forms or chat, you grant permission to our law firm to contact you by phone, text messaging, automatic telephone dialing system and/or a telephone dialing system using artificial or prerecorded voice message, and/or email using the phone number or email address that your provided so we may assist you with your request for a free case evaluation and you consent to our use of an automatic telephone dialing system, even if the number you provided us is a wireless line. Being contacted is not a guarantee of acceptance of our services. No mobile information will be shared with third parties/affiliates for marketing/promotional purposes. All the above categories exclude text messaging originator opt-in data and consent; this information will not be shared with any third parties. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.